South Africa Flag logo

South African Skeptics

April 26, 2017, 11:50:20 AM
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Go to mobile page.
News: Please read the forum rules before posting.
   
   Skeptic Forum Board Index   Help Forum Rules Search GoogleTagged Login Register Chat Blogroll  
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic:

Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life -

 (Read 13070 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Haribol2332
Newbie
*

Skeptical ability: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 20


« Reply #75 on: June 25, 2014, 09:49:27 AM »

Ohhh, I don't think you know what contraceptive means:

Quote
contraceptive
adjective
adjective: contraceptive

    1.
    (of a method or device) serving to prevent pregnancy.

Read carefully: PREVENT PREGNANCY. What you're talking about is abortion. Contrary to what you might want to believe, us westerners don't have abortions all the frikkin time. We much, MUCH prefer preventing pregnancy in the first place... using contraceptives.

don't use bogus word jugglery and simply tell me if sex life is fun or pleasure then why do you use contraceptive method ? why do you kill child ? if everything is pleasure in sex life then why do you kill child why do you use contraceptive method ? what is your answer street dog ?

do you have any answer at all ?
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2407


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #76 on: June 25, 2014, 12:28:24 PM »

Oh God. Now the hairball has rolled on from the stale metaphysics of unmoved movers and onto the ethics behind recreational movers.

Rigil
Logged
BoogieMonster
NP complete
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2759



« Reply #77 on: June 25, 2014, 13:37:38 PM »

As far as I can make out, he seems to argue that life begins before conception.
Logged
cr1t
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 544



cr1t
« Reply #78 on: June 25, 2014, 14:00:38 PM »

Come on guys just admit that us soulless western brainless dogs eat our young  Roll Eyes
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2407


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #79 on: June 25, 2014, 14:07:36 PM »

As far as I can make out, he seems to argue that life begins before conception.
Yes, and it therefore follows that by not bringing life into the world at every possible opportunity, we senseless canids are effectively killers.

Hairball, if you don't mind me asking, are your views fairly representative of the inhabitants of your country, or are you more or less on the fringe there too?

Rigil
Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +58/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3658


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #80 on: June 25, 2014, 14:35:52 PM »

If a gamete is properly alive, we have a problem or multiples of 280,000,000Wink

Some fitting commentary:
Monty Python: Every Sperm is Sacred from The Meaning of Life

'Luthon64
Logged
BoogieMonster
NP complete
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2759



« Reply #81 on: June 25, 2014, 14:44:38 PM »

Come on guys just admit that us soulless western brainless dogs eat our young  Roll Eyes

For his definition of young, some of us do.  Grin
Logged
BoogieMonster
NP complete
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2759



« Reply #82 on: June 25, 2014, 17:46:52 PM »

But I have a question...

If, when you have sex, the life being created during intercourse actually already exists before you even do the deed, and what you're simply doing is a "duty" to allow that "life" into the real world...

What about artificial insemination? Surely in that case there would've been no "potential pre-existing life" waiting for that event to occur, since it's an entirely artificial event that wouldn't have occurred in nature.

Are you saying people born because of scientific intervention in fertility, have no souls?!
Logged
Haribol2332
Newbie
*

Skeptical ability: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 20


« Reply #83 on: June 25, 2014, 17:58:42 PM »

But I have a question...

If, when you have sex, the life being created during intercourse actually already exists before you even do the deed, and what you're simply doing is a "duty" to allow that "life" into the real world...

What about artificial insemination? Surely in that case there would've been no "potential pre-existing life" waiting for that event to occur, since it's an entirely artificial event that wouldn't have occurred in nature.

Are you saying people born because of scientific intervention in fertility, have no souls?!

rascal idiot As soon as we speak of nature, the next question should be, "Whose nature?" For instance, I speak of my nature, and you speak of your nature. Therefore, as soon as nature is mentioned, the next inquiry should be, "Whose nature?"
   Nature means energy, and as soon as you speak of energy, you must accept that there is a source of that energy. For example, the source of electric energy is the electric powerhouse. Electricity is not produced automatically. We must install a powerhouse and a generator. Similarly, in the Vedas it is said that material nature is working under Krsna's direction.
Logged
BoogieMonster
NP complete
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2759



« Reply #84 on: June 25, 2014, 18:08:32 PM »

Not to be, I dunno, overly literal... but I asked a question, and you didn't answer it.
Logged
Haribol2332
Newbie
*

Skeptical ability: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 20


« Reply #85 on: June 25, 2014, 18:21:16 PM »

But I have a question...

If, when you have sex, the life being created during intercourse actually already exists before you even do the deed, and what you're simply doing is a "duty" to allow that "life" into the real world...

What about artificial insemination? Surely in that case there would've been no "potential pre-existing life" waiting for that event to occur, since it's an entirely artificial event that wouldn't have occurred in nature.

Are you saying people born because of scientific intervention in fertility, have no souls?!

`1st of all define this thing that what is consciousness ? what your scientists says about thing thing that what is consciousness ? define it now.

and the first step is to know the difference between a living body and a dead body. What is the difference?

and then next Question is Why a dead child born does not grow, does not change body? The body is a lump of matter. Analyze the body. Where is life?

_________________

and these question i have already answered but now you answer these questions and simply tell me what is scientists says about these points ? and if they will say that we will define these points in future then i kick on there face right now.

All these scientists, they discover so many things. Why they did not discover something that he would not die? He would not become old? Where is that discovery? They will say: "Yes, in future." One man is kicking on your face, and you are saying: "Yes, in future, when I shall become strong, I shall kick him." But you are, my dear sir, being kicked now. What you are doing now? "Yes, I'm getting strength by your kicking."

so what is use of your medical science if you cannot even define what is difference between living man and dead man ?
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2407


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #86 on: June 25, 2014, 18:57:01 PM »

Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +58/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3658


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #87 on: June 25, 2014, 19:25:30 PM »

Ah, frooty breakfast.  I’ll have this:



'Luthon64
Logged
cr1t
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 544



cr1t
« Reply #88 on: June 26, 2014, 09:02:32 AM »

But I have a question...

If, when you have sex, the life being created during intercourse actually already exists before you even do the deed, and what you're simply doing is a "duty" to allow that "life" into the real world...

What about artificial insemination? Surely in that case there would've been no "potential pre-existing life" waiting for that event to occur, since it's an entirely artificial event that wouldn't have occurred in nature.

Are you saying people born because of scientific intervention in fertility, have no souls?!

rascal idiot As soon as we speak of nature, the next question should be, "Whose nature?" For instance, I speak of my nature, and you speak of your nature. Therefore, as soon as nature is mentioned, the next inquiry should be, "Whose nature?"
   Nature means energy, and as soon as you speak of energy, you must accept that there is a source of that energy. For example, the source of electric energy is the electric powerhouse. Electricity is not produced automatically. We must install a powerhouse and a generator. Similarly, in the Vedas it is said that material nature is working under Krsna's direction.

Wait what I though electricity comes from the sparks of when Thor hits his hammer against his anvil.

In any case Thor could take Krsna in a fight any day.
Logged
BoogieMonster
NP complete
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2759



« Reply #89 on: June 26, 2014, 09:59:05 AM »

Quote
Are you saying people born because of scientific intervention in fertility, have no souls?!

This is a simple yes or no question. You answer either a "yes" or a "no". You don't need to define death and life to answer this question. Yes, or No.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7   Go Up
  Print  


 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.766 seconds with 23 sceptic queries.
Google visited last this page March 26, 2017, 05:50:23 AM
Privacy Policy