South Africa Flag logo

South African Skeptics

March 26, 2017, 07:20:57 AM
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Go to mobile page.
News: Please read the posting guidelines before posting.
   
   Skeptic Forum Board Index   Help Forum Rules Search GoogleTagged Login Register Chat Blogroll  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic:

Free online courses

 (Read 2332 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The Vulcan
Shipmate
Full Member
***

Skeptical ability: +3/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 229



WWW
« on: January 19, 2014, 23:07:31 PM »

There's some interesting free open courses from places like https://www.coursera.org/ and http://ocw.mit.edu/index.htm

There's plenty of courses ranging from critical thinking, economics, physics and biology to engineering and maths etc.

You guys know of more places like these perhaps?
Logged
cr1t
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 544



cr1t
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2014, 08:47:11 AM »

There's some interesting free open courses from places like https://www.coursera.org/ and http://ocw.mit.edu/index.htm

There's plenty of courses ranging from critical thinking, economics, physics and biology to engineering and maths etc.

You guys know of more places like these perhaps?


iTunes university has a bunch of stuff for free, you can download and listen to lectures,
but obviously you don't enroll any where and get any sort of qualification, so just for self enrichment
Logged
Jacques
Full Member
***

Skeptical ability: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 131


JacquesR
WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2014, 07:09:15 AM »

In terms of market share, the biggest ones are Coursera, that you mention above, Udacity, and EdX
https://www.udacity.com
https://www.edx.org
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2401


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2014, 09:30:10 AM »

Time to go see the optician again. I was puzzled why you folk should be interested in witchcraft of the malicious incantation variety, until I opened a link: free courses, then, not curses. Roll Eyes Lips Sealed

R.
Logged
BoogieMonster
NP complete
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2748



« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2014, 10:12:42 AM »

FWIW I delved into some of the MIT courses (math and electronic engineering) a while ago and they're very good. Man, how I wish my lecturers were that approachable, clear, pragmatic, etc. In another life, were my parents more wealthy, I would've jumped at any chance to attend that place.
Logged
brianvds
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +12/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1454



« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2014, 16:01:17 PM »

Time to go see the optician again. I was puzzled why you folk should be interested in witchcraft of the malicious incantation variety, until I opened a link: free courses, then, not curses. Roll Eyes Lips Sealed

R.

I did a curse in computer programming once. It was when I realized that some modes of thought are beyond me. :-)
Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +57/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3650


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2014, 16:20:41 PM »

I did a curse in computer programming once. It was when I realized that some modes of thought are beyond me. :-)
How long ago, and which programming language(s)?

I doubt your self-assessment, though.  If you can break the solution to a problem down into elementary steps the way you might solve a puzzle or a maths problem, you have what it takes to program.  I suspect your self-assessment is mostly the result of an enormous quantity of abstraction that has occurred in programming, plus the baffling jargon in which it comes wrapped.  Things like object-oriented programming and event-driven programming are profoundly mystifying when you’re expected to start essentially from scratch.  Coming from a background firmly steeped in procedural programming (i.e. the way programming first began), it took me a good long time to get my head around those newer concepts.  At the beginning, it was very much a case of “monkey see, monkey do.”

'Luthon64
Logged
BoogieMonster
NP complete
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2748



« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2014, 17:07:28 PM »

Not to put anyone down, or contradict Mefi's assertions...

But I used to tutor programming to HS kids, and found there is the odd individual who cannot fathom even the simplest of programming concepts. Despite hours of personal attention, countless explanations, examples, etc. etc. and yet others seem to grasp it almost instantly (having had no prior experience).

One dude, after exhausting all other explanatory avenues. I sat down and tried to explain variables using physical lego blocks, over and over... Even that failed.

I will be willing to concede I could've just been the wrong teacher for the wrong pupil, but this experience has me thinking that there are people who are just not wired that way. Or whom have been completely failed by our education system. ... who knows?

My view: It probably has a lot to do with mathematical ability. Nature, nurture... etc.
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2401


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2014, 19:20:20 PM »

How long ago, and which programming language(s)?
1982. Sony Betamax. Evil

R.
Logged
brianvds
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +12/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1454



« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2014, 19:36:45 PM »

But I used to tutor programming to HS kids, and found there is the odd individual who cannot fathom even the simplest of programming concepts.

I think I fall into that class. :-)
To answer Mefiante's question, I did a course or two in Pascal, and then some Java, as part of a Unisa diploma, the title of which I cannot remember anymore and which I never completed. Couldn't make head or tails of either. I scraped through some courses, mind you, but quit on some of the others before I could fail. :-)

Some concepts, notably recursion, I just never could get my head around. More accurately, I understood much of the stuff in principle, but could never manage to write any algorithms that actually worked, couldn't work out why they didn't work, and couldn't understand where I went wrong even when someone pointed out the errors.

Mind you, some years later, while working night shifts in a blood lab, I sometimes had time on hand, so I started playing around with JavaScript, and used it to create a little program that tests mental arithmetic skills such as tables, addition and subtraction. But I fear that was the high point of my abortive journey towards becoming the next Alan Turing.

The funny thing is, when it comes to mathematics, the little I do manage to wrap my head around, I find very beautiful. I would have loved to make a career out of it. It's in fact the frustration of my entire existence that the only things I am genuinely interested in are also ones for which I have no talent.

Now in visual art, which is my current hobby, I can of course get away without talent by simply pretending to be "modern." If Damien Hirst can run that scam, then so can I, dammit!  Cheesy

Speaking of which, at the school where I work, I have been charged with doing the visual arts component of the kids' arts and culture curriculum. Oh, the horror: I finally got to see the textbooks yesterday, and it's the most trite, contentless crapola imaginable. So now I have little choice but to invent three new curricula for three different grades, and write three textbooks this year. Thanks again, education department, for yet another sterling job.

At least I work for a private school where I can actually do this. In a state school I'd have been stuck with the official curriculum...
Logged
brianvds
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +12/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1454



« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2014, 19:43:35 PM »

1982. Sony Betamax. Evil

Hahaha, another category of stuff I never could master: technology.
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2401


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #11 on: January 22, 2014, 20:24:32 PM »

1982. Sony Betamax. Evil


Hahaha, another category of stuff I never could master: technology.



True what you say about our competencies sometimes being out of sync with our passions. I love chess, for example, and enjoy playing on line. Thanks to lots of games against several international opponents, I'm proud to say that I now win almost half my games over at chesskid.com.


Rigil
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
GoogleTagged: google 70138588 skeptic d2k


 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.428 seconds with 23 sceptic queries.
Google visited last this page February 24, 2017, 17:46:23 PM
Privacy Policy