Fool’s Gold: Teleology in Science

(1/12) > >>

Mefiante (July 17, 2009, 11:23:13 AM):
Split from “Rethinking junk DNA”, reply #7.

But dearest Mechanist, through your lame reactions you’ve made it abundantly clear, and continue to do so, that you’re not at all interested in any “being civil” or “a good environment to exchange ideas,” merely in affirmations for your preconceptions. That’s where the incivility actually started, a point that is obvious, it seems, to everyone but you. Therefore, your repeated accusations of incivility are fundamentally flawed for being self-servingly hypocritical. That’s in addition to what cyghost said.

So surprise everyone here and dispel the null hypothesis about you. Or do whatever tickles you and live with the consequences.

'Luthon64
Teleological (July 17, 2009, 12:22:42 PM):
Neat... now formalize the null hypothesis if you don't mind :D.
cyghost (July 17, 2009, 13:36:38 PM):
You always do this. You evade. You answer questions with questions. You make no argument beyond copying and pasting.

On any forum where people do respond to your "posts", they are invariably negative and critical. This is supposed to be what you are craving. Your responses to such makes it abundantly clear that you are *not* interested in debate and simply want to preach to the choir. You are not up to the task of defending your position and do a bad job of presenting your side.

The only positive thing that can be said is that you are tenacious as hell :D
Teleological (July 17, 2009, 14:09:52 PM):
I ALWAYS do that? Is that the story of me for today you would like to spread :o?

BTW, You are also welcome to actually formalize something I can actually respond to.
cyghost (July 17, 2009, 14:35:40 PM):
I ALWAYS do that? Is that the story of me for today you would like to spread :o?
Thank you fo proving my point for me. ;D :D ;)
Quote
BTW, You are also welcome to actually formalize something I can actually respond to.
So surprise everyone here and dispel the null hypothesis about you.

That is what you needed to repond to. It was easy. Or should have been. ???

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Skeptic Forum Board Index

Non-mobile version of page