South Africa Flag logo

South African Skeptics

June 26, 2017, 21:07:06 PM
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Go to mobile page.
News: Please read the posting guidelines before posting.
   
   Skeptic Forum Board Index   Help Forum Rules Search GoogleTagged Login Register Chat Blogroll  
Pages: [1] 2 3  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic:

Sam Harris: Science can answer moral questions [split]

 (Read 10977 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Teleological
Moderate Realist
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +2/-28
Offline Offline

Posts: 980

Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit


« on: November 02, 2010, 15:02:29 PM »

Sam Harris wants to disregard the is/ought, fact/value dichotomies and in doing so circumvent the naturalistic fallacy and claim that science can determine an ought from an is.

I wonder if he is aware of natural law theory? Or if he even has some sort of understanding of the terms "good" and "goodness"?

Moreover, to argue for an in-principle incompatibility between our materialistic (philosophically speaking) conceptions of mind/brain and such ideas as intentionality and will (free or otherwise) is to ignore the entire realm of emergent phenomena and the infancy in which the physics thereof presently finds itself.
Muffles, I'll ask you again:
What is your understanding of a "materialistic (philosophically speaking) conception" of reality?

You continuously employ bait and switch tactics whenever you discuss "materialism" or "materialistic philosophy".

You bait by praising the success and "history" of the "materialistic approach", whatever that is, you don't say.
And when asked to elaborate on this (and your understanding of materialistic philosophy), you switch by saying materialism is not a complete and fully-developed metaphysical position.

You want to call yourself a materialist and praise its successes but at the same time haven't got a clue what it entails and then demand that some other "scientific" approach is needed before abandoning materialism.


« Last Edit: November 02, 2010, 22:23:06 PM by BluEGrAY, Reason: Changed title » Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +59/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3665


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2010, 15:39:56 PM »

Since you are patently incapable of following something that has been explained to you in several different ways at several different times and places, I’ll not waste my time.

So, whatever you say, Teleological.  Whatever you say.

Now be a good boy and go back to playing with your pigeonholes, see?

'Luthon64
Logged
Teleological
Moderate Realist
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +2/-28
Offline Offline

Posts: 980

Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit


« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2010, 16:14:05 PM »

Since you are patently incapable of following something that has been explained to you in several different ways at several different times and places, I’ll not waste my time.

So, whatever you say, Teleological.  Whatever you say.

Now be a good boy and go back to playing with your pigeonholes, see?

'Luthon64
I wouldn't mind a few links to these alleged explanations... Especially the ones were you "at several different times and places" explained what is your understanding of a "materialistic (philosophically speaking) conception" of reality.

Waiting...
Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +59/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3665


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2010, 17:06:11 PM »

Waiting...
Why?  You are perhaps bored with your pigeonholes, yes?  Say it’s not so!

'Luthon64
Logged
Teleological
Moderate Realist
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +2/-28
Offline Offline

Posts: 980

Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit


« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2010, 17:23:03 PM »

Stop evading the question Roll Eyes.
What is your understanding of a "materialistic (philosophically speaking) conception" of reality?
Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +59/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3665


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2010, 17:36:58 PM »

It’s floating around these forums, as you very well know.  What part of “I’ll not waste my time” is causing you grief?  Hounding me won’t do you any good either.  You’ll just get more of the same.  Your choice.

'Luthon64
Logged
Teleological
Moderate Realist
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +2/-28
Offline Offline

Posts: 980

Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit


« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2010, 17:52:42 PM »

It’s floating around these forums, as you very well know.  What part of “I’ll not waste my time” is causing you grief?  Hounding me won’t do you any good either.  You’ll just get more of the same.  Your choice.

'Luthon64
You see, the reason I keep asking you this very simple question (well it should be for a person that praises "the success and history of the materialistic approach", whatever that is) is that you actually have not. You have not in any of your posts described what your understanding of a "materialistic (philosophically speaking) conception" of reality is.

I don't think that you even know what you are talking about when you talk about materialism/materialistic approach/materialistic conception etc. It just seems to sounds good to you for some weird reason.
Logged
rwenzori
Sniper
Sr. Member
****

Skeptical ability: +7/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 403


Merda accidit.


« Reply #7 on: November 02, 2010, 18:46:17 PM »


You see, the reason I keep asking you this very simple question (well it should be for a person that praises "the success and history of the materialistic approach", whatever that is) is that you actually have not. You have not in any of your posts described what your understanding of a "materialistic (philosophically speaking) conception" of reality is.

I don't think that you even know what you are talking about when you talk about materialism/materialistic approach/materialistic conception etc. It just seems to sounds good to you for some weird reason.

LOL! If it ain't old BOÖTES the clone, raised from the dead just like Lazarus. It was BOÖTES, agreeing with Techne, who was really the great BOÖTES himself, who was Techne actually, and who is Teleological, who said

Quote
Well, I am with you that the statement "Reality (including your brain or mind or whatever) is nothing but matter." is probably false.

What happened? Tire of debating these heavy matters with yourself? Were you cloned by the Raelians? Or were you just Siamese twins joined at the brain, but now separated ( sadly with some loss of mental capacity )?  Grin Grin

Stop being rude now, and do try to behave - remember what happened to you over at MyBB when you couldn't control yourself LOL. And try to engage what little is left of your brain and try the amazing teleological function SEARCH - you will find Mefiante's views clearly stated all over the forum. Or is she a tad high-brow for you, above your head, English not being your home tongue and all that? After all, no point BOÖTING yourself in the arse and looking stupid.

Logged
Teleological
Moderate Realist
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +2/-28
Offline Offline

Posts: 980

Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit


« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2010, 19:05:50 PM »


You see, the reason I keep asking you this very simple question (well it should be for a person that praises "the success and history of the materialistic approach", whatever that is) is that you actually have not. You have not in any of your posts described what your understanding of a "materialistic (philosophically speaking) conception" of reality is.

I don't think that you even know what you are talking about when you talk about materialism/materialistic approach/materialistic conception etc. It just seems to sounds good to you for some weird reason.

LOL! If it ain't old BOÖTES the clone, raised from the dead just like Lazarus. It was BOÖTES, agreeing with Techne, who was really the great BOÖTES himself, who was Techne actually, and who is Teleological, who said
Huh? What's this all about? Do you know the meaning of "clone/sock puppet"? It actually means the same person with different nicknames agreeing with each other (sort of like your several clones @ MyBB, Telephrone comes to mind lol), not two different people agreeing with each other no matter what. They are called sycophants, much like muffles supporting your "Merda accidit" for some weird reason lol. Now that you know the meaning of "clone/sock puppet", I hope you realise you have mistakenly and rudely accused me of it. Bad telephrone cough rwenzori...

And try to engage what little is left of your brain and try the amazing teleological function SEARCH - you will find Mefiante's views clearly stated all over the forum. Or is she a tad high-brow for you, above your head, English not being your home tongue and all that? After all, no point BOÖTING yourself in the arse and looking stupid.
Well, if you stop for 1 second to just blindly (almost sycophant-like) jump in and try and defend muffles, why don't you try to use the search button yourself to try and find where muffles explained in her own words what her understanding of a "materialistic (philosophically speaking) conception" of reality is. Be constructive for once in your life  Wink, you'll realise she hasn't got a clue.
Logged
Hermes
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +18/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 1137



« Reply #9 on: November 02, 2010, 19:25:35 PM »

Do you know the meaning of "clone/sock puppet"?
Do you know the meaning of "gadfly/gatvlieg"?
Logged
rwenzori
Sniper
Sr. Member
****

Skeptical ability: +7/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 403


Merda accidit.


« Reply #10 on: November 02, 2010, 19:30:43 PM »


Huh? What's this all about? Do you know the meaning of "clone/sock puppet"? It actually means the same person with different nicknames agreeing with each other (sort of like your several clones @ MyBB, Telephrone comes to mind lol), not two different people agreeing with each other no matter what. They are called sycophants, much like muffles supporting your "Merda accidit" for some weird reason lol. Now that you know the meaning of "clone/sock puppet", I hope you realise you have mistakenly and rudely accused me of it. Bad telephrone cough rwenzori...

Oh wow! THAT was a hard one to work out LOL! But you don't see my other MyBB personae do you? Yours on the other hand are a bit obvious.

Well, if you stop for 1 second to just blindly (almost sycophant-like) jump in and try and defend muffles, why don't you try to use the search button yourself to try and find where muffles explained in her own words what her understanding of a "materialistic (philosophically speaking) conception" of reality is. Be constructive for once in your life  Wink, you'll realise she hasn't got a clue.

Why? Can't you manage by yourself? Ag shame. Besides, the one with very little clue is you. But you might follow in the footsteps of the Great Redeemer and redeem yourself by telling us what YOUR view is of a "materialistic (philosophically speaking) conception". Not quite the same as an Immaculate Conception, I'll bet LOL. In your own words. No links, no quote-mining. If you can, anyway.
Logged
BOÖTES
Newbie
*

Skeptical ability: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« Reply #11 on: November 02, 2010, 20:05:51 PM »

What is your understanding of a "materialistic (philosophically speaking) conception" of reality?

Oh yes! I quite agree with Teleological. Teleological, you know we worship your awesomeness, please tell us about materialist concoction. Oh do, please.
Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +59/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3665


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #12 on: November 02, 2010, 21:55:03 PM »

You see, the reason I keep asking you this very simple question (well it should be for a person that praises "the success and history of the materialistic approach", whatever that is) is that you actually have not.
No, sweet Tinklepops.  The reason you keep asking the question is because you are not sufficiently skerp to recognise an answer when it is presented to you, suppositorially rather than by in-you-end-o.  Now you seek to make your incapacity my problem.



You have not in any of your posts described what your understanding of a "materialistic (philosophically speaking) conception" of reality is.
Oh my, what fundamentalist tendencies you display!  Repeating X over and over and over again fails to render X true, you know.  Sadly, religionists have exhausted that tactic for you.



I don't think that you even know what you are talking about when you talk about materialism/materialistic approach/materialistic conception etc.
You reckon, eh?  Ignorance does abound.



It just seems to sounds good to you for some weird reason.
The only weirdness here is your constant inability to grasp the goodies.  And it doesn’t sound good, neither.

'Luthon64
Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +59/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3665


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #13 on: November 02, 2010, 22:33:41 PM »

Well now, “Flame Wars.”  Hello again, old friend. Grin

'Luthon64
Logged
Teleological
Moderate Realist
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +2/-28
Offline Offline

Posts: 980

Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit


« Reply #14 on: November 03, 2010, 06:21:34 AM »

Muffles, you can evade the question all you want, it doesn't change the fact that you haven't got a clue Wink. If you had any, it wouldn't be so difficult to answer such a simple question. Instead you invest, laughingly, so much energy to evade, insult and accuse others of the very things you are guilty of. And you say others have fundamentalist tendencies...ROFL  Roll Eyes.

Oh Hermes, yes, I can understand why you might think of this place as a "longdrop". Lol, that must be what rwenzori and muffles' view of reality is like.

And can you spell... toady? And btw, do you even care that muffles is a materialist, despite her having no clue (or limited anyway) what it entails...
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  All   Go Up
  Print  


 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.589 seconds with 23 sceptic queries.
Google visited last this page May 29, 2017, 23:33:50 PM
Privacy Policy