Rethinking junk DNA

<< < (6/8) > >>

Teleological (July 20, 2009, 15:11:46 PM):
You still have not answered any of the questions... I wonders if someone else is going to point this out to you? MODS?
cyghost (July 20, 2009, 15:30:59 PM):
Irony, thy name is phrony.
Teleological (July 20, 2009, 15:36:41 PM):
You made a few interesting assertions. Now support them if you can. Here they are again for ALL to see.
You say:
If there were indications of design or directed purposes, science would have picked it up.

I say:
Indications of design or directed purposes implies the presence of a mind or minds that intentionally directed something. You say science would have picked it up.

I ask you again:
How you would propose science to scientifically prove the presence of other minds (other than human) when indications of design or directed purposes implies the presence of a mind or minds that intentionally directed something?
How do you think science can do that?
Which methods would you put forward?
What would you take as an indication?
Can science measure design?
How would science detect the workings a mind without empirical proof of the existence of that mind?
cyghost (July 20, 2009, 16:21:53 PM):
whiskey tango foxtrot. superserial.
Teleological (July 20, 2009, 16:52:10 PM):
Your assertion, you back it up.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Skeptic Forum Board Index

Non-mobile version of page