The BOOBQUAKE - 911

<< < (3/5) > >>

Julian (April 29, 2010, 19:23:58 PM):

Are you sure the moobs don't belong to Deepak Chopra?



http://mashable.com/2010/04/04/deepak-chopra-earthquake/
StevoMuso (April 30, 2010, 01:18:47 AM):
Phew! I go away for a few days and the forum goes and gets a bit rough. Nice posts GOthCG - specially the first 3 pics - gonna be another earthquake soon ...
theboobquakes (April 30, 2010, 06:57:43 AM):
they thought BOOBIES had no effect... WRONG!


see, I just want to make it clear to the rest of you:


jen is unable to see that there is a CONFLICT BETWEEN EROS & SCIENCE....

________________

http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/in-name-of-science-i-offer-my-boobs.html

ETA: follow-up

http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/quick-clarification-about-boobquake.html

see how we take a term and convert it into its AUTHENTIC POLITICAL DIMENSION - THAT
OF LIBERATION - not just merely harmless expression...

they thought BOOBIES had no effect... WRONG!
____________
threeholerhauler (April 30, 2010, 08:20:54 AM):
OK, so are there any psychiatrists/psychologists out there who can analyse the ramblings of this theboobquakes /mabus person? I think he/she/it should make for an interesting paper as he/she/it (referred to as he for the sake of brevity), seems to suffer from a rather comprehensive list of mental and psychiatric deviations from the norm. Although I am in no way qualified, I'm going to have a go.

Let's start with the name: I have seen him referred to as Mabus. I assume this is one of the many names this poor person has used in the past. If not, oops. As far as I can determine, Mabus is supposedly the forerunner to the Antichrist. http://www.mabus.biz/faq/index.php. So this dude declares himself to be satan's little helper, yet preaches religious rhetoric. Is this an indication of his stupidity, or is an indication of his role/identity confusion. IOW, a Freudian projection indicating gender confusion?

YOUR *****FINAL WARNINGS*****

He offers us a final warning stated from the first person perspective. He appears to think that the warning is his to issue. Is he therefore claiming to be god? Monstrous delusions of grandeur right there along with further identity confusion.

they thought BOOBIES had no effect... WRONG!

I don't think I have heard the word "boobies" in conversation since my very early primary school days. Is this person a tempestuous child? Is he completely immature? Is he as gothcatgirl suggests, a 40 yo virgin? Who knows? But the use of the word at the least suggests a detachment from societal norms and a childish attitude to sexuality. This may sound innocent, but unless I am mistaken, most child abusers suffer from some sort of preadolescent sexual stagnation.

see how we take a term and convert in into its AUTHENTIC POLITICAL DIMENSION - THAT OF LIBERATION - not just merely harmless expression...

OK, so he implies that harmless expression is OK, but liberation is not! He is opposed to liberation! There have been many groups in history opposed to the liberation of people, women, Africans, gays, christians etc etc. Groups like the Nazi's and other fascist groups, the apartheid regime, the taliban etc. I am not aware of any anti-liberation movement that has survived the scrutiny of history and moral judgement. Is he so deluded that he fails to realise that the freedom of expression he enjoys exists only due to the constant incremental liberation of the human mind?
He gives us more insight into his political leanings later on.

FOR THE *HEADLESS IDIOT* called m.shermer
Now I want you to listen to this little f*cker...
Randi:
When I see your UGLY FACE I understand why you are an atheist

Ad Hominem argument. Boring. The traditional recourse of those who have no facts to argue with. Also an indication of immaturity. Basically equates to the kid in the sandpit calling his sister a "poopy pants", when he notices that she has a shovel and he doesn't.
Also not very christian now is it? But then again is he a christain, satan's helper, or god herself


with the atheists:
they start begging when they start dying...

____________________
Atheists,
but you have NO ANSWER TO DEATH... therefore you FAIL...

More grandiose delusions. Does he honestly believe that he knows what atheists do when they start dying. He must be omnipresent then.
He claims atheists have no answer to death. Indicates his need for there to be more after death. I think this chappy realises that he made a bit of a waste of his life and desperately needs a second chance. An atheist knows there is no second chance. When life stops, it stops. The body's decomposition may support other life forms, but for the dead dude, it is over.


GET OUT OF MY UNIVERSE

Again god commands us to get out of his universe. Or is he quoting god. Has Moses returned? Not delusional at all.

Crystal Night, Atheists!

This is perhaps his most disturbing sentence and a further indication of his political leanings. Crystal night, or Kristallnacht was the start of the holocaust against the Jews in WW2. It was a horrific night led by the Hitler Youth, the Gestapo and the SS. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristallnacht. Is he proposing the mass murder of people who do not share his religious and political views?

Einstein puts the final nail in the coffin of atheism…

Luckily Einstein escaped Kristallnacht and lived to enrich the world with his magnificent wisdom. If one qoute-mines his enormous body of work, he can be made to appear partial to almost any argument. If one takes the time to read all of his ponderings and quotes, his true thoughts start to emerge. Here is a link to a page with all of his quotes on religion and god: http://www.spaceandmotion.com/albert-einstein-god-religion-theology.htm. I am quite sure he didn't believe in a crucified lamb.


Final Notes:

A lot more can be gleamed from this person's rhetoric, but as I have stated I am not a psychiatric professional and therefore I am not qualified to dig deeper.

Gothcatgirl. Repeatedly scrolling past your post was a real joy, even if it made me loose my train of though several times. Were any of those yours?

I am new here. That's because I am a newly reformed former lifelong christian, and current agnostic. I found myself pulled away from religion by the logic and sanity and beautiful rationality of Randi, Shermer, AronRa, Thunderf00t, Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins. But the stronger force than the pull was the push. I was pushed away by the moronic, unfounded and militant arguments made by my fellow christians. Much like the idiotic post I am replying to today. Well done theboobquakes, JAMESLAMBI55, mabus, or whatever your name is. Keep pushing those sheep away!
Faerie (April 30, 2010, 08:35:19 AM):
Self respecting psychologists refer psychopaths to psychiatrists for the necessary happy pills.

Unless you're a very ambitious person, you get rid of the obviously delusional and mad ones very quickly.

Or maybe I'm just too old for this type of shit.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Skeptic Forum Board Index

Non-mobile version of page