South Africa Flag logo

South African Skeptics

November 20, 2019, 14:04:49 PM
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Go to mobile page.
News: Please read the forum rules before posting.
   
   Skeptic Forum Board Index   Help Forum Rules Search GoogleTagged Login Register Chat Blogroll  
Pages: 1 2 3 [All]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic:

Interesting estimates

 (Read 7574 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2463


Three men make a tiger.


« on: January 03, 2013, 09:45:19 AM »

Came across an interesting estimate.

Imagine that you've extracted all of the salt from all of the oceans and sprinkled it over all of the world's dry land masses. How deep would such a layer of salt be?

(click to show/hide)
Logged
cr1t
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 544



cr1t
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2013, 10:33:29 AM »

My Guess a kilometer
Logged
st0nes
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +10/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 942



mark.widdicombe1
WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2013, 11:02:36 AM »

Came across an interesting estimate.

Imagine that you've extracted all of the salt from all of the oceans and sprinkled it over all of the world's dry land masses. How deep would such a layer of salt be?

(click to show/hide)

Source? (Or sauce?)
Logged
Brian
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +8/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 1367


I think therefor I am, I think


« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2013, 11:06:00 AM »

my guess is that it would be 3.5987kms thick
Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3756


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2013, 11:17:56 AM »

Using the following rough data estimates (drawn from memory):
  • Ocean salinity (by mass) cs = 3% = 0.03
  • Fraction of Earth’s surface covered in sea/ocean fw = 70% = 0.7
  • Average ocean depth dw = 3,000 metres
  • Ocean water density ρw = 1 ton/m3
  • Density of granular salt ρs = 1.3 ton/m3

yields a salt depth of ds = 162 metres.

(I leave it as an exercise for the reader to derive the simple formula relating ds to the other variables.)

'Luthon64
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2463


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2013, 11:50:01 AM »

Source? (Or sauce?)
The spoiler links to the source. Wink

I must say, the answer leaves me a bit annoyed about the inflated price of table salt! Roll Eyes

I leave it as an exercise for the reader to derive the simple formula
ds = (cs*fw*dw*ρw)/((1-fw)*ρs) ?
« Last Edit: January 03, 2013, 12:09:37 PM by Rigil Kent » Logged
cr1t
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 544



cr1t
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2013, 11:58:55 AM »

Using the following rough data estimates (drawn from memory):
  • Ocean salinity (by mass) cs = 3% = 0.03
  • Fraction of Earth’s surface covered in sea/ocean fw = 70% = 0.7
  • Average ocean depth dw = 3,000 metres
  • Ocean water density ρw = 1 ton/m3
  • Density of granular salt ρs = 1.3 ton/m3

yields a salt depth of ds = 162 metres.


Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3756


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2013, 14:29:29 PM »

ds = (cs*fw*dw*ρw)/((1-fw)*ρs) ?
Perfect.  Well done!


Wink

'Luthon64
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2463


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #8 on: June 13, 2013, 16:51:22 PM »

Staying with the halides: What volume of potential chlorine gas, at atmospheric pressure, is locked up in a 500g packet of table salt?

Rigil
Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3756


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #9 on: June 13, 2013, 18:16:59 PM »

You didn’t mention the temperature Tongue.  It’s equally important.  I’ll assume (1) standard ambient temperature and pressure (SATP) conditions (25 °C and 100 kPa = 0.986 atm), and (2) that molecular chlorine gas (Cl2) behaves like an ideal gas at SATP conditions.

(click to show/hide)

'Luthon64
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2463


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #10 on: June 14, 2013, 10:25:27 AM »

Very good. (I did it like this: (36/58)(500/58)moles x 22.4 cdm/mole = 120cdm.)

OK, something with a more speculative answer: How much water does South Africa save every year due to people peeing in the shower?

Rigil
Logged
brianvds
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +13/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1861



WWW
« Reply #11 on: June 14, 2013, 14:18:57 PM »

I did some back-of-an-envelope calculations for a star gazing evening I am going to have at the school where I work.

If you dug a tunnel through the center of the Earth, it would take over five days to drive a car through it at 100 km/h (and no rest stops).

At the same speed, it would take more than five months to reach the Moon.

And to get to Saturn (seeing as Saturn is one of the planets that will be visible)? More than a thousand years. If you started driving at around the time of the fall of Rome, you'd be getting to Saturn now.

But how long to drive to the nearest star?

(click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: June 15, 2013, 16:31:37 PM by brianvds » Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3756


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #12 on: June 14, 2013, 14:45:50 PM »

(I did it like this: (36/58)(500/58)moles x 22.4 cdm/mole = 120cdm.)
Hmm, I must challenge the leading factor “(36/58)” (≈ 0.621).  Presumably this is the molar mass ratio of Cl to NaCl, and, if so, the reason for using it is opaque to me.

Here’s why:  500 g of salt corresponds to 500/58 = 8.62 moles of NaCl.  Since each NaCl molecule contains a single Cl atom, completely dissociating the NaCl must then yield exactly 8.62 moles of atomic Cl, and the Na portion is no longer of any further interest.  However, since chlorine normally exists as a diatomic molecular gas, i.e. as Cl2, each mole of atomic Cl yields 0.5 moles of molecular chlorine gas.  Therefore, the factor in question should be 0.5, and your result would then become 96.6 dm3 = 96.6 litres (22.4 litres being the volume of one mole of an ideal gas at STP, not SATP).  If I use STP rather than SATP in my calculation, the temperature and pressure to use are 273.15 K and 101.325 kPa (= 1 atm) respectively, and my result is then 95.9 litres, which differs by 0.7% from yours.  This difference is readily explained by the slightly different molar weights for salt that were used.



How much water does South Africa save every year due to people peeing in the shower?
A few million bladder-days’ worth, roughly the same amount consumed in bars and restaurants.  Or do you want that in units of camel humps per kidney failure?  Tongue



But how long to drive to the nearest star?
Huh? Are you sure you calculated correctly?  I get an answer that is 1/100th of that which you give — still a very long time, though.

'Luthon64
Logged
Hermes
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +18/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 1137



« Reply #13 on: June 14, 2013, 17:07:01 PM »

If you dug a tunnel through the center of the Earth, it would take over five days to drive a car through it at 100 km/h (and no rest stops).
That would make it somewhat cumbersome to dig out Johannesburg's gold from the Hawaii side, but if the labour unrest continues ...
Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3756


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #14 on: June 14, 2013, 17:31:33 PM »

Forget about gold mining and think of tourism instead.  Such a tunnel would make for the ultimate bungee jump ’cos you would be able to do it without any cord being attached to your ankles!  You’d have to do it at night by launching yourself off the edge and aiming for the very faint speck of light about 12,500 km away.  You’d bounce back and forth for a good few hours and any self-respecting thrill-seeker would no doubt have a fun time of it.

There are two obvious disadvantages, though. First, you’d be in a really warm place when you finally stopped bouncing, and (2) getting back to surface again would require a jet plane.  Still, the resultant cost would make the jump available only to the very wealthiest clients and so you won’t have to worry about setting up a call centre or a complaints line…

'Luthon64
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2463


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #15 on: June 14, 2013, 20:20:43 PM »

Presumably this is the molar mass ratio of Cl to NaCl, and, if so, the reason for using it is opaque to me.
True. Suddenly my calculation seems a bit opaque to me too. Lips Sealed

How much water does South Africa save every year due to people peeing in the shower?
A few million bladder-days’ worth, roughly the same amount consumed in bars and restaurants.  Or do you want that in units of camel humps per kidney failure?  Tongue

Here is one possible answer:

SA population is about 40,000,000 people.
Of which maybe 50% have access to a shower, i.e. 20,000,000 people.
Of which maybe 50% are prepared to urinate whilst showering, so 10,000,000 people.
Which they do maybe twice weekly. This gives 20,000,000 instances of not needing to flush a toilet per week.
Which comes to 1 billion saved flushes per year.
A toilet cistern holds maybe 8L of water.
So the annual water saving thanks to this slightly unsavoury activity comes to an estimated 8,000 megaliters per year.

Which is just over 6% of a major Eastern Cape water reserve, the Kouga dam!

Rigil

 
« Last Edit: June 14, 2013, 20:41:08 PM by Rigil Kent » Logged
brianvds
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +13/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1861



WWW
« Reply #16 on: June 15, 2013, 03:31:02 AM »


But how long to drive to the nearest star?
Huh? Are you sure you calculated correctly?  I get an answer that is 1/100th of that which you give — still a very long time, though.

Quite possibly - I have been battling the flu and was high on meds. Let me go check those calculations...

Logged
brianvds
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +13/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1861



WWW
« Reply #17 on: June 15, 2013, 03:42:53 AM »


But how long to drive to the nearest star?
Huh? Are you sure you calculated correctly?  I get an answer that is 1/100th of that which you give — still a very long time, though.

Quite possibly - I have been battling the flu and was high on meds. Let me go check those calculations...


Okay, here's the new calculation:

Light travels at 300 000 km/s. So in a year, it travels 60 x 60 x 24 x 365 x 300 000 = 9 460 800 000 000 km.

Alpha Centauri is about 9 460 800 000 000 x 4.3 = 40 681 440 000 000 km from us. At 100 km/h it would take 406 814 400 000 hours to get there. Which is 16 950 600 000 days, and 46 440 000 years.

Better? I originally must have added zeros somewhere, or something - when I think now of the day I did this, I sort of see everything through a reddish fog of fever and coughing and drugs... :-)

As you say, still a rather frightful distance - as bright as the stars are, I am sometimes surprised we can see any at all. :-)
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2463


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #18 on: June 15, 2013, 08:23:30 AM »

I am sometimes surprised we can see any at all. :-)
It is almost scarily amazing. And to think that you pick any star or far off galaxy and bring it into perfect focus with nothing but a stable atmosphere and a telescope. One has to marvel at the immense predictability with which light travels over even such vast distances.

Equally astounding to me is the sensitivity and range of the human eye, even in spite of it's apparent "design" flaws.

Rigil
Logged
brianvds
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +13/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1861



WWW
« Reply #19 on: June 15, 2013, 12:17:46 PM »

It is almost scarily amazing. And to think that you pick any star or far off galaxy and bring it into perfect focus with nothing but a stable atmosphere and a telescope.

Which brings me to another question I have been wondering about, and which will ft neatly into this thread of estimates. Interstellar space isn't completely empty. There is in fact a sort of interstellar "atmosphere" between us and the stars. Apart from nebulae, it is evidently not enough to blot out the stars, but how dense is the interstellar medium? How much gas is there between us and the nearest star, compared to what is in our own atmosphere?

Perhaps members with the necessary knowledge of this will want to post us some calculations and estimates. :-)
Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3756


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #20 on: June 15, 2013, 12:42:58 PM »

… but how dense is the interstellar medium?
About one hydrogen atom per cm3 plus a small amount of dust.  All in all, it accounts for about 5% of a galaxy’s total mass, which is a surprisingly large fraction.

'Luthon64
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2463


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #21 on: June 15, 2013, 14:00:48 PM »

So then, given one hydrogen atom per cubic meter, what are the chances that a photon will collide during a 4.3 year journey through space?

Rigil
Logged
brianvds
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +13/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1861



WWW
« Reply #22 on: June 15, 2013, 16:29:32 PM »

So then, given one hydrogen atom per cubic meter, what are the chances that a photon will collide during a 4.3 year journey through space?

Rigil

Yes, and how much "air" is there between us and Alpha Centauri? Presumably it's negligible, because we can see stars much further away clearly.

And should that be "further away" or "farther away"? I can never remember what the rule is with those two words... :-)

Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2463


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #23 on: June 16, 2013, 09:16:00 AM »

I think the chance of a photon crashing into a hydrogen atom during a 4.3 light year journey is vanishingly small.
Logged
Hermes
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +18/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 1137



« Reply #24 on: June 16, 2013, 15:11:57 PM »

one hydrogen atom per cubic meter
Rigil
1/cm3, not 1/m3  Wink
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2463


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #25 on: June 16, 2013, 16:58:13 PM »

one hydrogen atom per cubic meter
Rigil
1/cm3, not 1/m3  Wink
Ah ok, thanks. That comes to, what, 1,000,000 H-atoms/m3 ? Which improves the chances of a collision to  10-19 to 1 against. Still a pretty safe bet. Wink
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2463


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #26 on: July 06, 2013, 21:12:57 PM »

Yet another excuse for riding around on a motorcycle is to engage in an alphabet run. The idea is to visit twenty-six towns, each starting with a different letter of the alphabet, and take a picture of your bike at the town's Welcome To sign. A longer version of the run can be completed sequentially, meaning that you start in a town beginning with A, then you ride (on roads only) to the next town starting with a B, and so on, until ending up at a town starting with Z.

Now, if you were to start off in Adelaide in the Eastern Cape, estimate the minimum distance you have to travel to complete a sequential South African alphabet run.

Rigil
« Last Edit: July 07, 2013, 10:18:54 AM by Rigil Kent » Logged
brianvds
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +13/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1861



WWW
« Reply #27 on: July 07, 2013, 05:27:41 AM »

Yet another excuse for riding around on a motorcycle is to engage in an alphabet run. The idea is to visit twenty-six towns, each starting with a different letter of the alphabet, and take a picture of your bike at the town's Welcome To sign. A longer version of the run can be completed sequentially, meaning that you start in a town beginning with A, then you ride (on roads only) to the next town starting with a B, and so on, until ending up at a town starting with Z.

Now, if you were start off in Adelaide in the Eastern Cape, estimate the minimum distance you have to travel to complete a sequential South African alphabet run.

Rigil

At the rate they are changing place names in this country, you'll never complete it; by the time you get to your next town on your itinerary, the name will have changed.

Or alternatively, you simply stay in Adelaide, and the name will change through the whole alphabet. And don't worry, they will put up new Welcome to signs. Judged by what happened here in Pretoria when they changed street names,that is the one thing they really are highly effective at - the new street names were up within a day or two of the decision being made.


Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2463


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #28 on: July 07, 2013, 10:03:32 AM »

LOL; yes that could be a very feasible solution. While hunting for local towns beginning with I - somewhat of a rarity - I was happy to come across Idutywa, only to find it was changed to Dutywa in 2004! Looks like it'll have to be Irene now, or with a bit of licence, Ibayi.

Rigil
« Last Edit: July 07, 2013, 10:22:13 AM by Rigil Kent » Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3756


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #29 on: July 07, 2013, 10:18:58 AM »

Looks like it'll have to be Irene now. Sad
Not to spoil your fun, but Irene isn’t a town.  It’s a suburb of Centurion, Pretoria.  Try Ixopo instead.

'Luthon64
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2463


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #30 on: July 07, 2013, 10:25:08 AM »

Looks like it'll have to be Irene now. Sad
Not to spoil your fun, but Irene isn’t a town.  It’s a suburb of Centurion, Pretoria.  Try Ixopo instead.

'Luthon64

Thanks ... I was in Irene many moons ago to attend a cheese making course. Must have mistaken it for a town in its own right.

Rigil
Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 2463


Three men make a tiger.


« Reply #31 on: November 28, 2013, 15:46:03 PM »

Quote
To date, SAB has reached 7303 taverns and distributed 10 456 600 condoms to them over a period of a year. This has assisted in averting 20,914 new HIV/Aids infections.
  And not 20 915, mind you.  Roll EyesUndecided

Reference

Rigil
Logged
BoogieMonster
NP complete
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +19/-1
Online Online

Posts: 3122



« Reply #32 on: November 28, 2013, 15:56:50 PM »

Quote
To date, SAB has reached 7303 taverns and distributed 10 456 600 condoms to them over a period of a year. This has assisted in averting 20,914 new HIV/Aids infections.
  And not 20 915, mind you.  Roll EyesUndecided

I have to wonder how many cases of HIV are caused by booze in the first place.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [All]   Go Up
  Print  
GoogleTagged: com google skeptic


 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 1.423 seconds with 23 sceptic queries.
Google visited last this page February 06, 2019, 14:21:17 PM
Privacy Policy