South Africa Flag logo

South African Skeptics

November 19, 2019, 14:28:59 PM
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Go to mobile page.
News: Please read the posting guidelines before posting.
   
   Skeptic Forum Board Index   Help Forum Rules Search GoogleTagged Login Register Chat Blogroll  
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic:

The hitch on having cancer.

 (Read 4457 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Julian
Full Member
***

Skeptical ability: +2/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 151


« Reply #15 on: September 12, 2010, 12:46:58 PM »

Thanks, I thought it was something like that. This forum sure is educational at times.
Logged
Michael Meadon
Full Member
***

Skeptical ability: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 121



michaelmeadon
WWW
« Reply #16 on: September 12, 2010, 18:46:38 PM »

@Teleological: Fail to understand the posts of others, much?
Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3756


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #17 on: September 12, 2010, 19:43:22 PM »

@Teleological: Fail to understand the posts of others, much?
Not just their posts.  Teleological is the archetype pathological ignoramus concerning anything that does not conform to his archaic worldview.  Nor is he in any way open to anything that challenges it.  Nor is he able (or willing) to mount anything besides third-hand sophistry and incoherent contrivance in its support.  Nor does he actually respect honest, open inquiry or the epistemological foundations of science, which, when applied in everyday practice, constitute the foundations of modern scepticism.  Nor does he often respect the norms of debate such as answering legitimate questions.  His only “defence” is unwarranted haughtiness disguised in transparent, agenda-laden, put-on, pseudo-penetrating questions lifted from the writings of far more prominent minds (or the slick clichés appearing as space fillers at the end of Reader’s Digest articles – take your pick).  All he wants, in brief, is a soapbox, not the truth.  The following are illustrative cases in point:
I am still trying to figure out the logic behind a person that shouts and moans and swears at something they believe does not exist.
and
Looks at the world around me, sees people who tries to speak of entities that they don't believe in in an irreverent, impious manner. Asks for the logic behind it... can't get a logical answer. Waits...
These are the inane questions of one who hasn’t spent even a minute in earnest contemplation of the issues at hand.

I have little but disdainful chuckles and an occasional ad hominem for such ongoing pretence and artifice.  He knows the conditions for civilised debate.  They have been put to him often enough here, as they have elsewhere.

'Luthon64
Logged
Teleological
Moderate Realist
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +2/-28
Offline Offline

Posts: 980

Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit


« Reply #18 on: September 13, 2010, 07:41:02 AM »

@Teleological: Fail to understand the posts of others, much?

No, not really. Though I fail to see you or any other person person providing a rational reason for having a blasphemy event. Oh well, there is hope.

@ muffles, shame, and you accuse others of wanting a soapbox while running your sad little personal soapbox. Get over it, get over me and try to be a bit more positive and constructive. How about you spend a little earnest contemplation about the issue at hand. So far... trolling (which you admit to many times, shamelessly at that as well), hand waving and ad hominems are all you have. Unimpressive really. Perhaps saying nothing is better than trolling for you?
Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3756


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #19 on: September 13, 2010, 08:17:38 AM »

There, you see what I mean?  Instead of actually addressing what few points I made in my previous post, Teleological immediately scrabbles to the top of his soapbox and shouts a churlishly petulant, “Tu quoque!”

What else is new?

'Luthon64
Logged
Teleological
Moderate Realist
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +2/-28
Offline Offline

Posts: 980

Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit


« Reply #20 on: September 13, 2010, 08:28:24 AM »

There, you see what I mean?  Instead of actually addressing what few points I made in my previous post, Teleological immediately scrabbles to the top of his soapbox and shouts a churlishly petulant, “Tu quoque!”

What else is new?

'Luthon64
You had point in your little melodramatic ad hominem laden prose? Don't make me laugh.
Logged
cyghost
Skeptically yours
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +12/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 1410


Carpe diem


« Reply #21 on: September 13, 2010, 08:42:06 AM »

You had point in your little melodramatic ad hominem laden prose? Don't make me laugh.
I saw the point. I think may others did. Perhaps the problem lies with you?
Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 3756


In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται


WWW
« Reply #22 on: September 13, 2010, 10:03:13 AM »

Get over it, get over me…
But I am all over you!  That’s what irks you so, isn’t it?



Don't make me laugh.
Oh, I would never presume to make unwarranted inferences where the evidence is so scant – in this case that you have a sense of humour.

'Luthon64
Logged
Teleological
Moderate Realist
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +2/-28
Offline Offline

Posts: 980

Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit


« Reply #23 on: September 13, 2010, 10:11:39 AM »

Get over it, get over me…
But I am all over you!  That’s what irks you so, isn’t it?
I am irked by you? Errr.. more like bored. As cute as your personal, ad hominem laden prose is sometimes, it really gets a bit boring. Self-admitted trolls are predictably boring you know. But hey, assume whatever you want, I'll continue to assume that you are a shameless troll. Actually, I don't have to, you have admitted it.
« Last Edit: September 13, 2010, 19:49:10 PM by Teleological » Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
  Print  

 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.514 seconds with 24 sceptic queries.
Google visited last this page July 12, 2017, 08:21:57 AM
Privacy Policy