## South African Skeptics

October 20, 2018, 17:04:21 PM
 News: Please read the forum rules before posting. Entire Forum This board This topic Members Google Entire Site
 Skeptic Forum Board Index Help Forum Rules Search GoogleTagged Login Register Chat Blogroll
 Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic:

# Order of calculations

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
brianvds
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +12/-0
Offline

Posts: 1713

 « on: September 01, 2012, 18:03:25 PM »

This has been floating around on Facebook:

I get 7, using the BODMAS rule. But I note some people refer to the PEMDAS rule. Never heard of it (I assume the last four letters stand for multiply, divide, add, subtract, but what does P and E stand for?), and using it some people get 5, while others get 6 or 7. Does the order in which one multiplies and divides really not matter? It seems not to matter in this particular problem, but I recall having seen cases where it matters a great deal, and you get two completely different answers depending on whether you first divide and then multiply, or first multiply and then divide.

Is the BODMAS rule simply a convention, or are there other reasons why it must be followed?

 Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline

Posts: 3734

In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται

 « Reply #1 on: September 01, 2012, 18:49:54 PM »

Multiplication and division are hierarchically equal, as are addition and subtraction.  However, multiplication/division takes precedence over addition/subtraction.  Therefore,

6 – 1 × 0 + 2 ÷ 2
= 6 – (1 × 0) + (2 ÷ 2)
= 6 – 0 + 1
= 7

There is no other valid answer.  Any other answer reveals a misunderstanding of BODMAS/BEDMAS/BIDMAS/PEMDAS.

Remember that multiplication/division and addition/subtraction are binary operations, i.e. they take two operands.

The BODMAS rules are a convention and they derive mostly from the way we write algebraic expressions such as polynomials, e.g. y = 3x2 – 4x3.  Without the BODMAS rules, such expressions would be a lot more cumbersome to write down.

'Luthon64
 Logged
 Pages: [1]   Go Up

 « previous next »