What I believe is if a patient can be cured by a gentler system of medicine, why not?
The available evidence strongly indicates that homoeopathy is a placebo, not a system of medicine, gentler or otherwise. Your own beliefs are not relevant to what actually is the case.
Why to subject him to conventional medicine which is harsh on human body?
It’s only harsh where no real alternative is available. Homoeopathy is not a real alternative.
When something we can’t cure in Homoeopathy, we ourselves refer our patients to our colleagues who are CM practioners.
Too many case histories of serious disease indicate exactly the opposite.
Even, homoeopathic medicines taken during surgical procedures, it can enhance the recovery (faster healing) of the patient.
Repeatable, objective, clear-cut evidence, please!
Homeopathy plays vital role in curing an infectious diseases.
Repeatable, objective, clear-cut evidence, please!
Homeopathic medicines can kill bacteria.
Repeatable, objective, clear-cut evidence, please!
Viral infections such as common cold, influenza, viral hepatitis (jaundice) etc. are very well treated with homeopathy.
Repeatable, objective, clear-cut evidence, please!
'Luthon64