South Africa Flag logo

South African Skeptics

November 19, 2019, 04:21:07 AM
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Go to mobile page.
News: Follow saskeptics on twitter.
   
   Skeptic Forum Board Index   Help Forum Rules Search GoogleTagged Login Register Chat Blogroll  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic:

PAP building - environmental laws enforced

 (Read 450 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Lilli
Sr. Member
****

Skeptical ability: +3/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 435



Lelani Stolp
« on: September 22, 2010, 11:09:58 AM »

OK I realize that I am obsessive about my job, and that most people won't find this bit of news interesting at all, but for the first time in SA history, an environmental consultant is being prosecuted (under the National Environmental Management Act) for screwing up. (about time, because screw-ups in this industry happens almost daily) The Beeld article http://www.beeld.com/Suid-Afrika/Nuus/PAP-gebou-in-vlei-Man-in-hof-20100921 tells the shortened version of the story. I happen to know this guy, and though he has been doing environmental work for a while, he is in fact a town-planner by training. No wonder he managed to overlook the wetland. I am seriously glad that our environmental laws seem to be enforced on some level nowadays, but I'm not sure what the punishment should/will be? Same with all the Rhino poachers recently nabbed. I think environmental crimes weigh very heavily, simply because I think if you piss in your own drinking water - your problem, but environmental degradation affects everybody, globally. Still, I'm not sure if a town-planner who made a very bad judgement in order to make very big bucks deserves to sit in jail for the rest of his life next to drug-dealers, murdurers and rapists.  Undecided
Logged
Faerie
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +10/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 2114



« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2010, 11:19:38 AM »

Dont they generally just post massive fines for this type of thing? Its not quite white-collar crime is it?
Logged
Lilli
Sr. Member
****

Skeptical ability: +3/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 435



Lelani Stolp
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2010, 11:33:55 AM »

Section 71 (2) of the National Environmental Management Act (107 of 1998) says basically that non-compliances with the Act is punishable by a fine up to R1 million or 1 year's imprisonment or both. (OK so, not the rest of his life, but for a one-man enviro-show this guy's entire career is SO over)
I'm not sure how I think these people should be punished, though.
Logged
GCG
Hero Member
*****

Skeptical ability: +8/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 1829


skeptical mantis is skeptical


adele horn
WWW
« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2010, 11:42:15 AM »

the oke should have known better, in the end, but yes, i dont think he needs to be in the chookie.
he should then spend time fixing the fuckup he's made,  like a community service type thing.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
GoogleTagged: building environmental laws


 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.348 seconds with 23 sceptic queries.
Google visited last this page February 26, 2019, 15:34:44 PM
Privacy Policy