Abiogenesis

(1/2) > >>

Teleological (July 06, 2010, 13:19:18 PM):
Slowly but surely scientists are discovering the possible ways life emerged from non-life. Personally, I think the RNA-world first scenario driven by small, transiently self-sustaining metabolic cycles that produce precursors for the RNA world is the most plausible scenario of how it happened.

But, other areas of research are also interesting. For example:
Zapping Titan-Like Atmosphere With UV Rays Creates Life Precursors

So, feel free to post more interesting developments related to abiogenesis.
Mefiante (June 02, 2014, 10:03:17 AM):
Reconstructed ancient ocean reveals secrets about the origin of life. An incipient answer to the problem of how metabolic reactions may have arisen. If borne out by further research, it will mark an important bridging step between life emerging from non-life, something the creationist and ID crowd say can’t happen by strictly natural means.

'Luthon64
BoogieMonster (June 02, 2014, 10:09:17 AM):
May I ask a humble question...

Given how much effort guys like the WHO and CDC have to go through to contain pathogens, and given that research into abiogenesis aims to, in proving that it works, essentially create a new form of life that may or may not have different chemistry than our own. Do they go through the same rigour to ensure such new lifeforms don't escape the lab with potentially devastating consequences?
cr1t (June 02, 2014, 10:24:07 AM):
May I ask a humble question...

Given how much effort guys like the WHO and CDC have to go through to contain pathogens, and given that research into abiogenesis aims to, in proving that it works, essentially create a new form of life that may or may not have different chemistry than our own. Do they go through the same rigour to ensure such new lifeforms don't escape the lab with potentially devastating consequences?

No, I'm sure they just wash the stuff down the basin at the end of the day.
Mefiante (June 02, 2014, 10:41:01 AM):
If current expert knowledge is to be trusted, we’re still quite a long way off from creating any new life forms. The aim of such investigations is to broaden understanding of what the required conditions are for abiogenesis to occur, if at all. To answer your question, while there are many different aspects to this field with differing levels of associated (potential) hazard, I’d be astonished if relevant biochemical and biophysical research in areas where the (potential) hazard is very high, is conducted at facilities that are any less secure than biosafety level 4.

Currently, the probability is much greater that an engineered or naturally mutated pathogen could appear and decimate humanity than that abiogenesis research would produce a simple new life form that attacks humans.

'Luthon64

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Skeptic Forum Board Index

Non-mobile version of page