## South African Skeptics

September 20, 2019, 16:40:09 PM
 Skeptic Forum Board Index Help Forum Rules Search GoogleTagged Login Register Chat Blogroll
 Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down
Author Topic:

# Bedlam with BODMAS and BEDMAS

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
brianvds
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +12/-0
Offline

Posts: 1833

 « on: May 19, 2014, 19:30:32 PM »

Suppose you have this calculation:

One third of 3^2 + 1

Depending on the order in which you do the operations, you could get either 2 or 4 as answer. My intuition tells me you should get 4, i.e. if we combine the BODMAS and BEDMAS rules, we should get BEODMAS, not BOEDMAS.

Any comments from our fine mathematical minds here?

 Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline

Posts: 3752

In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται

 « Reply #1 on: May 19, 2014, 19:39:42 PM »

As it stands, the result is 10/3.  That’s because the wordy part of the question enjoys the lowest priority, and the question is not (32)/3+1 = 4, but instead (32+1)/3 = (9+1)/3 = 10/3, or 3.333…

I don’t see how you can get 2.  Even 9 is more likely: (32+1)/3 = 27/3 = 9.

'Luthon64
 Logged
brianvds
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +12/-0
Offline

Posts: 1833

 « Reply #2 on: May 19, 2014, 20:30:38 PM »

And if I rephrase:

1/3 of 3^2 +1   ?

What do we get now?

In short, BODMAS and BEDMAS seem to be in potential conflict. How do we resolve the conflict? What gets precedence, "of" or the exponent? Is it BEODMAS or BOEDMAS? Or neither, and if so, what then?

 Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline

Posts: 2460

Three men make a tiger.

 « Reply #3 on: May 19, 2014, 20:51:54 PM »

What gets precedence, "of" or the exponent?
The exponent. "Of" is the same as "multiply with what follows".

1/3 of 3^2 +1  = ⅓ x (32 +1) = 10/3

r.
 Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline

Posts: 3752

In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται

 « Reply #4 on: May 19, 2014, 20:54:33 PM »

The mathematical/arithmetical formulations always take precedence over the worded parts.  That’s the way I’ve both seen it treated and treated it myself.  Thus, “1/3 of 3^2 +1” is still “1/3×(3^2 +1)”, as before.

Any mathematician worth their salt would in any case carefully avoid such potential ambiguities.

'Luthon64
 Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline

Posts: 2460

Three men make a tiger.

 « Reply #5 on: May 19, 2014, 21:15:04 PM »

I don’t see how you can get 2.

Maybe thus

1/3 of 3^2 +1  = (⅓(3))2 +1 = 2

 Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline

Posts: 3752

In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται

 « Reply #6 on: May 19, 2014, 21:22:57 PM »

Yes, that’ll get you 2 as an answer.  With a real stretch, I can get the answers 2/3 and 4/3.  These results hinge on a different interpretation of the “^” operator, one with which C programmers will be familiar.

'Luthon64
 Logged
The Vulcan
Shipmate
Full Member

Skeptical ability: +3/-0
Offline

Posts: 230

 « Reply #7 on: May 19, 2014, 22:05:09 PM »

I like
1/3 x 3^2 + 1 = 4

1/3 of 3^2 +1   ?

Well this is just me as an ordinary layman, I like this answer best, because when I read 1/3x3^2 +1 I don't see why I must assume that the operation (3^2+1) would be meant to be in brackets the way the question was put, but I'm certainly no math guru, just to me that makes the most sense, but if you would've asked

What is one third of the sum of 3^2 and 1 I would then think to use brackets
 « Last Edit: May 19, 2014, 22:25:57 PM by The Vulcan » Logged
brianvds
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +12/-0
Offline

Posts: 1833

 « Reply #8 on: May 20, 2014, 04:54:06 AM »

I like
1/3 x 3^2 + 1 = 4

1/3 of 3^2 +1   ?

Well this is just me as an ordinary layman, I like this answer best, because when I read 1/3x3^2 +1 I don't see why I must assume that the operation (3^2+1) would be meant to be in brackets the way the question was put, but I'm certainly no math guru, just to me that makes the most sense, but if you would've asked

What is one third of the sum of 3^2 and 1 I would then think to use brackets

And this is indeed what I was taught in grade 8 (then standard 6) when I first learned it - that "of" takes precedence. Hence BODMAS, not BDMASO. Apparently they taught me wrong, but that BODMAS rule is still taught in schools all over the world. Under that rule, the calculation 1/2 of 4 + 2 would yield 4, not 3.

Except in some schools they teach BEDMAS, and pretend that "of" does not exist as operator.

Question is now what the heck do I teach a grade 7 class? Seems to me BEDMAS is probably better, and then to word problems in such a way that ambiguity will not arise when "of" makes its appearance? When at all in any doubt, always use brackets?
 Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline

Posts: 2460

Three men make a tiger.

 « Reply #9 on: May 20, 2014, 06:23:54 AM »

When at all in any doubt, always use brackets?
Precisely. You can never use too many brackets. (It's by far the most useful thing (short of the author himself pointing out what he meant originally (when he first wrote the text (whether at his home or office (whilst slightly drunk)))) for clarifying the meaning of an expression.)

R.
 Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline

Posts: 3752

In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται

 « Reply #10 on: May 20, 2014, 07:07:33 AM »

I must ask:  Did this question appear in a maths test?  And at what level?  If it did, shame on the teacher who set up the test.  The question is meant to trick pupils, not test any understanding of BODMAS.  That teacher no doubt meant that (1/3)×(3²)+1 = (1/3)×9+1 = 3+1 = 4 is the correct answer.  It is this sort of question that validates the complaint about pupils being trained to pass exams, not understand the subject matter.

If one were to encounter such an expression in a book or a journal paper, that would be a very rare occurrence, and the context would make clear what is meant, for example, “… and so the final answer becomes one-third of the previous expression 3²+1, or 10/3.”

As a side note, (and I think I may have pointed this out in another thread) it is beyond me why BODMAS has been made so overly complicated.  There is no reason to distinguish between multiplication and division, or between addition and subtraction.  Division is just multiplication by the divisor’s inverse, and subtraction is just addition by the addend’s negative.  Thus, BEMA or BOMA would concisely capture all of the precedence rules of arithmetical operations.

'Luthon64
 Logged
Rigil Kent
Clotting Factor
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +19/-3
Offline

Posts: 2460

Three men make a tiger.

 « Reply #11 on: May 20, 2014, 10:16:33 AM »

Thus, BEMA or BOMA would concisely capture all of the precedence rules of arithmetical operations.
With roots presumably lumped in with exponents, since nx = x1/n ?
 Logged
Mefiante
Defollyant Iconoclast
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +61/-9
Offline

Posts: 3752

In solidarity with rwenzori: Κοπρος φανεται

 « Reply #12 on: May 20, 2014, 10:41:57 AM »

Yup, just as division is multiplication in drag and subtraction is addition in a clown suit, extracting roots is exponentiation in a tuxedo.

'Luthon64
 Logged
brianvds
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +12/-0
Offline

Posts: 1833

 « Reply #13 on: May 20, 2014, 15:10:35 PM »

I still don't see why the rule is BODMAS, or BOMA, if "of" does not in fact take precedence...

But I agree that it overly complicates the issue. On the other hand, if I teach the kids BEMA, and then they go to another school, they may end up confused.
 Logged
Brian
Hero Member

Skeptical ability: +8/-1
Offline

Posts: 1367

I think therefor I am, I think

 « Reply #14 on: May 20, 2014, 15:36:06 PM »

Had this quiz on Facebook the other day: 4x4-4x4+4-4x4=? 20 in my book despite the lack of brackets...many said 320.
 Logged
 Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up